“Genre generator” websites create random examples of genres
using numerous conventions and patterns that are apparent in each piece. While
the topic and idea may differ, a number of fixed conventions remain constant,
which will become evident as the categories are more closely examined.
Hopefully, in exploring each of the conventions, one may better understand genre.
SCIgen is an example of a genre generator that specifies in
the realm of computer science research papers. The website allows the user to
input numerous authors of his or her choice to then create a research paper by
those authors. Each time a new genre is generated, although the authors and
topic change, some conventions remain relevant. For instance, the structure of
a science research paper often remains fixed. They usually start with a title
at the top that is followed by the author(s). Next, they have subtitles and
headings such as Observations and Experimentation. Likewise, the SCIgen
generated genres each contain a title, the author(s), and the subtitles and
headings Abstract, Table of Contents, Introduction, Related Work, Conclusion,
and References. While some papers contain titles such as Methodology and Permutable
Algorithms, the concept of the headings remain the same. In addition to the
titles, SCIgen genres each contain graphs and diagrams to convey ideas of the
paper. Finally, the last aspect of the papers that I personally observed is
that I couldn't understand not even one sentence of the actual context. These
science papers each use complicated, scientific jargon that can’t be
comprehended without prior knowledge of the ideas.
Another example of a genre generator is Pandyland. This
generator creates a comic strip by combining three pictures of different
interactions between two characters aimed to stimulate laughter from the reader.
Similarly to the SCIgen example, the actual context is different, but the “big
picture” is practically the same. For instance, the intent of the bright colors
of each comic is to provoke someone to read the short blurb. Furthermore, the
dialogue of each picture (if any) is short and humorous, and the actions of the
characters from picture to picture is portrayed in a simple manner. This makes
for an easy, quick to read comic.
Memegenerator is a website that produces memes, or popular
images from media with witty text over it. Like Pandlyland, each generated
piece is supposed to evoke laughter. Memes have become an internet sensation
because of their humorous characteristics. The illustration is usually very
popular. Whether the picture is a movie character or a trendy image, each meme
cannot survive without it. The text is short, funny, and clever. One thing to
notice is that memes with the same picture also follow similar structures in
text. For instance, although the end text can vary, the picture of Matrix
Morpheus from the movie The Matrix
has text that starts with “What if I told you.” The “Bad Luck Brian” memes all
have the same picture of some guy ironically named Kyle. The text on the top
starts with something positive and hopeful. However, as the title suggests, the
text on the bottom reveals the eventual misfortune of “Bad Luck Brian.”
Therefore, even in something as silly and simple as a meme, there are
conventions that make this genre unique from others.
A generator website that has helped many students conclude
their paper is actually another type of genre generator. Easybib is a website
that easily creates a bibliography with the help of inputted data from the
user. While the author, title, publisher, etc. are all different, the structure
of the bibliography prevails. Whether the user chooses MLA, Chicago, AMA, or
more formats, and regardless of if the piece cited is a book, website, newspaper,
etc., the website will create a bibliography that is properly indented, has
proper punctuation, and is alphabetical order.
As shown in the four examples, while the context of
different genres may be different, the conventions of each separate each genre
from another. Each website has a set of established characteristics that are
found in each generated item. Depicting the common patterns can help someone
determine what important features make up each genre. In addition, if one hoped
to be bold and innovative by breaking these conventions, he or she would better
understand which are acceptable to ignore so that the entirety of the genre is
not changed.
Mitchell,
ReplyDeleteYour bio:
In my opinion, humor is one of the highest forms of intelligence, so I don’t know if you can consider yourself dumb by writing “Once people get to really know me, they learn that I’m pretty dumb. It’s not that I don’t excel in class and get good grades, but many of the things I say aren't that intuitive. For example, last Monday, I asked our classmate if we were going to be writing in Writing 2.” That made me a laugh out loud. Awesome. (And, believe me, I’ll definitely try each and every class to make this course the opposite of a “boring, writing course that [you] probably would immediately despise.”
PB1A:
Resumes are a killer (in a super-distinct way) to think about genres and their conventions. Great pick. What you wrote here is on-point: “A resume’s rhetorical features is what mainly differentiates it from other documents. The purpose of it is to effectively communicate one’s assets to an employer in clear, succinct writing, or in layman’s terms, a life summary…Resumes often include headings such as education, work experience, honors, etc. to help prove one’s competence.”
(In future PBs, consider giving each post a specific title: ie, PB1A – The Many Rhetorical Features of Resumes. To balance that out with a compliment, you included a lot more paragraph breaks than other students, and I really appreciate that—it makes for easier reading.)
PB1B:
You’re absolutely right about this: “ the last aspect of the papers that I personally observed is that I couldn't understand not even one sentence of the actual context. These science papers each use complicated, scientific jargon that can’t be comprehended without prior knowledge of the ideas.” In a very real sense, they emulate “real life’ academic pieces that make it tough for anyone to understand who isn’t a part of the major/discipline/discourse community.
Excellent work, Mitchell. Keep it going. Check plus.
(PS: Easybib?! How did I not think of that?!)